| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Jones Maloy
Minmatar
   |
Posted - 2006.10.19 14:03:00 -
[1]
nerfbat just pwned wcs. well forget about using them now. and prepare to get ganked like never before. this sucks. i'm not going to lose a ship everytime i go into low sec just to make the gankers happy. nerf is bad. balance is needed. and it's obvious that they just got nerfed.
wcs just got nerfed like ammar. who flys ammar these days?
---
WCS Nerf boycott low-sec
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=411964Gaming La |
Jones Maloy
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.10.21 14:16:00 -
[2]
i'm just ****ed because i can't fit 2 wcs and rat at the same time. the low-sec risk:reward ratio just skyrocketed. i'm not going into low-sec anymore because it's no longer profitable. i can't rat when i have a max targeting range of 11.25km on my cruiser. i can't even use artillery because i have to be so close that they can't track their targets.
the ship hp thing is going to cause a hell of a lot of game balance issues and may take several months to sort it out. ship bonuses, modual stats, weapon properties, ammo damage, are all going to have to be ajusted. i think the people complaining about insta-popping got this pushed through. also this means my destroyer will no longer be able to kill cruiser rats in 0.3
i'm tempted to take a few months off from eve to avoid the train wreck i'm sure is coming.
---
WCS Nerf boycott low-sec
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=411964Gaming La |
Jones Maloy
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.10.21 14:20:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Humble Voh
And I don't think the game is in such a bad state that CCP need to implement a big change and then spend the next 6 months balancing it.
word
---
WCS Nerf boycott low-sec
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=411964Gaming La |
Jones Maloy
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 00:19:00 -
[4]
offense is now the only choice you can make to fit your ship. with the wcs nerf (nerfs are bad) there is no way to counter scrams without crippling your ship at the same time. a 11.25km max targeting range on my rupture really irks me. and that's only fit to counter one (1) warp scrambler. to get my range back i would have to fit three (3) sensor boosters. they don't stack remember? i now have a choice of damage mods or tank and almost all of my cpu is gone and no mid slots are left. that's one gimped piece of ship. i don't understand how anyone can see this as a good thing. oh, wait, gankers see it as a good thing.
---
WCS Nerf boycott low-sec |
Jones Maloy
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 01:09:00 -
[5]
what's wrong with having every ship fire on one to take it out fast? that's the smart thing to do.
---
WCS Nerf boycott low-sec |
Jones Maloy
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 11:21:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Ithildin
Oh, FRACK. I almost forgot!
Superweapon damage is fine, Tuxford!
Just reduce the time-to-damage by 50% instead!
The problem with Superweapons is not that it can't kill the heavily buffered battleships and command ships in one shot (this is actually a rather ridiculous idea!), the problem is that the non-buffered ships sized battlecruiser and larger has time to get away from the blast!
Of course, neither the damage nor the time-to-damage change is going to alter the fact that it's useless against an aligned ship, but a non-aligned still battleship takes about 12 seconds to align and warp away. I believe the current Superweapon build-up time is 15 seconds - change this to 7 seconds.
that and let a titan fit 2 superweapons so they can get the pods too
---
WCS Nerf boycott low-sec |
Jones Maloy
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.10.25 02:48:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Ithildin
Originally by: Jones Maloy
that and let a titan fit 2 superweapons so they can get the pods too
(Un)fortunately, the reactivation timer is a global timer on the player, not on the module.
well, change that too
---
WCS Nerf boycott low-sec |
Jones Maloy
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.10.27 14:44:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Tek'a Rain
bumpy patch of road right ahead, but ya roll over, ya move on, wheels keep turning. what else could ya do, stop?
if it's a cliff? yeah, you stop.
wcs -> nerfed. low sec ratting -> stealth nerfed. low sec mishing -> stealthed nerfed. low sec mining -> stealth nerfed. gate sniping -> uscathed.
why do people always complain about gate snipers using stabs when no-one can even get within 20km to scram them in the first place?
---
WCS Nerf boycott low-sec |
Jones Maloy
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.11.12 17:22:00 -
[9]
come kali, i'm not setting foot in low-sec. it will be a slaughterfest for any ship not using wcs. and those that do use it can't do anything but move around. plus they can still be scramed by 2 frigs unless they fit 4 wcs giving them 1/16th of their base range.
can you rat or mish in a cruiser with a max targeting range of 2.5km?
wcs has been nerfed, as in made totaly useless and inefective. those moduals are nothing more than scrap-metal now. the risk:reward ratio has skyrocketed making low-sec an unprofitable place to be. expect less people in low-sec than there are now.
with the major changes, instability of the server, and general lack of common sense i am tempted to walk away from eve.
---
WCS Nerf boycott low-sec |
| |
|